• December 14, 2017
    Member Login
    Username:

    Password:


    Not registered yet?
    Click Here to sign-up

    Forgot Your Login?
    Follow Us!
    Facebook icon
    UnionActive Newswire
     
    Join the Newswire!
    Updated: Dec. 14 (12:03)

    Generation Screwed
    Teamsters Local 355
    2018 BENEFIT IMPROVEMENTS
    Teamsters Local 71
    2018 TEAMCARE Health & Welfare Benefit Improvements
    TEAMSTERS LOCAL 577
    NATIONAL AGREEMENTQuestions and Answers
    Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
    DOT Drug Testing
    Teamsters Local 776
    Tentative Agreement AT&T Mobility
    Communications Workers of America Local 2336
     
         
    Important Links
    Visit www.thestand.org/!
  • Progressive Perspectives on the Future of the New Deal/Great Society Entitlement Programs
    Updated On: Feb 26, 2014

    The Future of the Social Safety Net
    Progressive perspectives on the the New Deal/Great Society entitlement programs
    Kit Rachlis, Ed Kilgore

    Table of Contents
    Introduction: The Future of the Social Safety Net

    (follow the More Information links below article to read these attached essays):

    1 - Triumph and Tribulation

    2 - When Public Opinions Collide

    3 - Social Insurance: The Real Crisis

    4 - Thoughts on a Center-Left Entitlements Strategy

    5 - Fiscal Policy, the Long Term Budget, and Inequality

    6 - "Entitlements" are Just a Budget Category

    7 - Investments and Entitlements

    8 - Counterpoint: On Generational Equity, Healthcare and Keynesian Economics

    9 - Counterpoint: Kuttner, Galston, and the Debate Over the Social Safety Net

    10 - Counterpoint: In Summation- The Future of the Social Safety Net

    This week and next, The American Prospect, in conjunction with The Democratic Strategist, is proud to sponsor a special forum titled: Progressive Perspectives on the Future of the New Deal/Great Society Entitlement Programs.

    This unique forum will proceed through seven essays—from Henry Aaron, Andrew Levison, Bob Kuttner, Bill Galston, Dean Baker, Mark Schmitt, and Will Marshall—with occasional summaries from the co-moderators, Kit Rachlis of the Prospect and Ed Kilgore of the Strategist.

    The distinctive goal of this forum is to offer a “progressives-only” debate on entitlements—a debate that is often avoided or distorted by the necessity to resist conservative ideological assaults on the New Deal and Great Society safety net or by media-driven elite “deficit hawk” campaigns that seem to begin with the assumption that America’s only fiscal problem stems from “unaffordable” or “runaway” entitlements.

    That in the mainstream media “entitlement reform” has become a synonym for structural changes in entitlements designed to cut benefits, shift costs to beneficiaries, or abandon national responsibility for these programs, has inhibited an important intra-progressive debate over how the safety net can be enhanced, sustained, and harmonized with other important progressive priorities.

    Progressive discussions of this subject are also frequently hampered by the conflation of substantive arguments about social policy itself with those focused on more practical matters of political strategy.
    Now, we believe, is an ideal time to re-open and clarify the intra-progressive debate over the future of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid (and perhaps food stamps and the post-entitlement cash assistance program Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, which also form elements of the safety net). After all, declining federal budget deficits have taken a lot of the steam out of the “fiscal crisis” campaigns on the right and center-right. Moreover, the abandonment of any “grand bargain” budget negotiations for the foreseeable future (mainly due to conservative refusal to consider tax increases on the wealthy) has taken “entitlement reform” proposals—particularly those conditionally proposed by the Obama administration—off the table as well. And finally, the “wait and see” period we have entered with respect to implementation of the Affordable Care Act means we can now discuss long-term prospects for Medicare and Medicaid without assuming these programs are eternally defined by their present role in the “Obamacare” system.

    We have asked a broad spectrum of progressive thinkers and writers to offer their thoughts on the future of entitlements. Some of these individuals are generally identified with a staunch defense of Social Security and Medicare as they are now, others fear entitlements violate intergenerational equity or threaten non-entitlement “investments.” What they all share, however, is a fundamental commitment to the preservation and strengthening of a robust social safety net as a central goal of progressive social policy.

    Aside from the light this forum may cast on the options facing progressives in maintaining a strong social safety net and the economic climate needed to sustain it, we also hope the forum will offer a model for an enhanced intra-progressive discourse. With the Obama administration soon to enter its final stage—and with progressives coming out of the defensive crouch conservative political tactics have induced—it is likely that we will soon witness one of those periodic “struggles for the soul” that occur when values, goals, policies, strategies and tactics are all under active discussion.

    As we all know, such discussions have in the past occasionally taken on a bitter tone of recrimination and name-calling, and have also become associated with the agendas of individual politicians and organized factions. In keeping with the philosophy of the Prospect and the mission of the Strategist, we have sought to foster an atmosphere of civil and empirically-based debate in which no one is presumed to have a monopoly on the mantle of progressivism and no one attempts to score political points by decrying either excessive orthodoxy or incipient heresy rather than achieving persuasion by careful, reasoned argument. 

    As a practical matter, after the initial essays in this forum have been presented, we will then entertain rejoinders and follow-ons from all participants—and if appropriate, from others. The forum will continue until all that’s worth saying has been said.  We hope you enjoy, and most of all, benefit from, this discussion of Progressive Perspectives on the Future of the New Deal/Great Society Entitlement Programs.

    About the Author

    Ed Kilgore is managing editor of The Democratic Strategist and the principal blogger for Washington Monthly's Political Animal blog. He is also a Senior Fellow at the Progressive Policy institute. Earlier, he worked for three governors and a U.S. Senator.

    Kit Rachlis is the editor-in-chief of The American Prospect. He has served as editor-in-chief of the L.A. Weekly, senior projects editor at the Los Angeles Times, and editor-in-chief of Los Angelesmagazine.  


    More Information:
    Triumph and Tribulation, by Henry Aaron
    When Public Opinions Collide, by Andrew Levinson
    Social Insurance: The Real Crisis, by Robert Kuttner
    Thoughts on a Center-Left Entitlements Strategy, by William Galston
    Fiscal Policy, the Long Term Budget, and Inequality - by Dean Baker
    "Entitlements" are Just a Budget Category, by Mark Schmitt
    Investments and Entitlements, by Will Marshall
    Counterpoint: On Generational Equity, Healthcare and Keynesian Economics, by Dean Baker
    Counterpoint: Kuttner, Galston, and the Debate Over the Social Safety Net, by W. Galston and R. Kuttner
    Counterpoint: In Summation- The Future of the Social Safety Net, by E. Kilgore and K. Rachlis
  • AFGE Local 3937

    Copyright © 2017.
    All Rights Reserved.

    Powered By UnionActive



    25501 hits since Jul 30, 2011


  • Top of Page image